Friday, 11 December 2015

"Black Mass" - Review

“Black Mass” (15)
Directed by: Scott Cooper.
Starring: Johnny Depp, Dakota Johnson, Benedict Cumberbatch, Kevin Bacon, Juno Temple, Corey Stoll, Joel Edgerton and Peter Sarsgaard.
Running time: 123 minutes.
Rated: ‘15’ for containing strong bloody violence and strong language.
Released in UK cinemas from the 25th of November, 2015. 

Marking the penultimate screening in an annual visit to the London Film Festival, Black Mass appeared to be a feature that Oscar voters would practically salivate over: a lavishly designed period drama, set against a series of tragic factual events, replete with meticulous costume design, an ensemble cast to die for and of course, a lead actor in an overly attention-seizing role. Yet, despite the not-so-ingeniously calculated release date of Black Mass (November, a cinematic period in which undeniable Oscar bait is frantically unloaded onto cinemas), Scott Cooper’s admission into the Hollywood system is guilty of many transgressions, particularly the cheap imitation of a true American classic: Goodfellas. Nevertheless, 123 minutes after a concoction of endless brutality amongst truly unscrupulous characters, my blood had run cold. Black Mass had earned the title of 2015’s most frightening film, thus far.



With material deriving from Dick Lehr and Gerard O’Neill’s source novel (Black Mass: The True Story of an Unholy Alliance between the FBI and the Irish Mob), Cooper’s film is a startlingly ferocious rendition of life within the feared and financially thriving Winter Hill Gang of South Boston, quietly led by the chilling James “Whitey” Bulger (Johnny Depp). But upon the return of recently inaugurated FBI agent named John Connolly (Joel Edgerton), a long-time friend of Bulger and his brother, a Massachusetts Senator (Benedict Cumberbatch), an alliance arises: Connolly decides to grant Whitey amnesty for his crimes and turn a blind eye to his current operations, in return for incriminating intelligence regarding the Italian Mafia – an organisation despised by them both. But when Whitey exploits Connolly’s agreement, a death toll begins to rise, leading the FBI to wonder, who is really in control?

Black Mass is in many ways, the product of an impressionable filmmaking team, who’s dedicated following of the sacred gangster sub-genre’s tropes are applaudable, yet somehow also frustrating, for Mark Mallouk and playwright Jez Butterworth’s screenplay is in actuality, a simplistic paint-by-numbers narrative which is liberated of painful mediocrity by one man: Johnny Depp. It isn’t often I admit that Depp is the greatest element of a particular film, but within Black Mass, the theatricality of Depp’s former performances is abandoned, in favour of a shockingly nuanced and career-revival turn which sent shivers down my very spine and is worthy of awards buzz. Depp’s appearance is in part, transformative, for the actor appears almost bald, accompanied by piercing blue eyes and facial prosthetics, culminating in a devilish cross between Bela Lugosi’s incarnation of Dracula, True Romance’s Vincenzo Coccotti (Christopher Walken) and Javier Bardem’s Anton Chigurh, of No Country for Old Men fame. But here, Depp’s portrayal of Whitey is concerned with believability, producing a methodically reserved performance relating to presence and speech – clearly a departure from Depp’s “larger than life” characters of yesteryear; a wicked character portrayed as a brooding introvert who despite first impressions, can be consumed by an unparalleled anger at the flick of a switch, resulting in malicious and horrifying acts, despite being a caring father and thoughtful presence in the neighbourhood, which Depp expertly handles throughout sombre and naturalistic moments, proving that he finally understands the phrase less is more, for his portrayal of Whitey is ultimately unpredictable, and captivating.



Despite being considerably overshadowed by Depp, the supporting cast attempt to rival Depp in relation to performances, particularly Joel Edgerton, who matches Depp in his extensive screen-time, but unfortunately not in regards to his acting abilities, delivering an almost comical and overly miscalculated performance, rather suited to that of a pantomime. Here, Edgerton seems completely out of place and better suited to earlier roles, such as Baz from 2010’s Animal Kingdom. Edgerton’s fellow cast members consist of a large roster of Britain’s and America’s finest on-screen talent. Yet, despite fine actors such as Cumberbatch, Juno Temple and Corey Stoll chewing on occasionally terrific dialogue, their roles are infinitesimal, to the point in which they appear for five minutes, then disappear (often killed). Adam Scott and Peter Sarsgaard are criminally underused, to the point in which Scott is only used for reaction shots (twirling an awesome moustache) and Sarsgaard portrays a coke-addled maniac, reduced to screaming and whining, whilst the many scenes belonging to the phenomenal Sienna Miller, were ultimately left upon the cutting room floor due to “narrative choices”. Once again, this is a clear example of an ensemble cast being used to create Oscar buzz, despite not suiting their roles, which is evident in relation to the poor Boston accents, in contrast to the similarly Boston-set and critically lauded film Spotlight from Thomas McCarthy, which also features fine American talent, yet is reserved in regards to accents, for fear of insulting audiences.

Verdict

Cooper’s beautifully lensed thriller may not strive to break the clichés which perpetually haunt the gangster sub-genre, yet Black Mass is an often exhilarating work of 70’s nostalgia, accentuated in its quality by a colourful yet underused supporting cast, despite this blood-soaked thriller predominantly serving as an acting showcase for the sensational Depp, in a chilling and commanding career-revival turn, whose greatest scenes are accompanied by an enthralling score from Junkie XL (as Tom Holkenborg). But as far as Bulger is concerned, Boston is his Wild West; a lawless town in which he is able to racketeer, kill and rule over in style. And for the most part, it’s thoroughly entertaining watching Depp at play, as he freakishly stares wide-eyed into the very windows of your soul. It’s just unfortunate that Black Mass is so conventional. Still, for a Depp-renaissance alone, it’s most certainly worth a viewing.


6 Stars out of 10
Written by Scott Gentry.

Film/TV Rating Key
1-2 stars out of ten = Awful.
3-4 stars out of ten = Average.
5-6 stars out of ten = Good.
7-8 stars out of ten = Excellent.
9-10 stars out of ten = Amazing.

Trailer




Clip

"Steve Jobs" - Review

"Steve Jobs" (15)
Directed by: Danny Boyle.
Starring: Michael Fassbender, Kate Winslet, Seth Rogen, Jeff Daniels, Sarah Snook and Katherine Waterston.
Running time: 122 minutes.
Rated: '15' for containing strong language.
Now showing in select UK cinemas.

Picture this: It’s the first step of your morning commute; you are sitting aboard a bus, intently studying those around you. What do you see? A multitude of increasingly powerful phones, at the hands of men, women and now more often than not, children. But how many of those are iPhone’s? The likelihood is the majority. It is undeniable, Apple have taken the world by storm. But where did the technological conqueror begin? Like many straight-forward biopics, the most remarkable of these stories derive from humble beginnings – in this case, a garage in Los Altos, California. But in Danny Boyle’s 11th feature film as director, acclaimed screenwriter Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network) is not particularly concerned with an overly remarkable life, or humble beginnings, opting instead to daringly limit himself, by entering the complex world of Steve Jobs in an unconventional manner, whilst focussing upon a naturalistic and wholly relatable story of varying motifs: friendship, loyalty, jealousy, class and power – Shakespearean?

Similar to last year’s outstanding Birdman, the energetic Steve Jobs is concerned about the events which take place backstage, as audiences are guided throughout three iconic stages within the life of Steve Jobs: the product launches of the Macintosh, NeXT computer, and the iMac. But behind those rimless eyeglasses is a tortured genius (portrayed here by Michael Fassbender), who is explored throughout a series of intense confrontations with family and close friends, concluding in a detailed character study of regret and existential drama, as he battles for supremacy.

Now the sixth film (second feature length) in a seemingly never-ending line of features regarding the tech genius, Steve Jobs arrives to the party late and unfortunately, a little underdressed. Having encountered distribution and production issues (the project was acquired by Universal Pictures, shortly after Sony Pictures placed the film in turnaround) from day one, Steve Jobs was poised to fail. In the film’s commercial run, perhaps it does, considering the film debuted (in America) to a measly $7.3 million. But the film’s strongest feature is Aaron Sorkin’s witty and kinetic screenwriting (“Musicians play their instruments. I play the orchestra.”), delivered terrifically by an almost outstanding cast and complemented by various stylistic decisions from Boyle, particularly the mise en scène, vibrant typography and camerawork.


Sorkin himself, dares not to conform to the simplistic, rise-fall-rise-again blueprint, instead opting to confine the biopic structure to the backstage areas, in which the actual drama comes to the fore. Perhaps, an ingenious play on Sorkin’s behalf. After all, the Steve Jobs we were accustomed to seeing is one manipulated by the mass media. But, what happens when the cameras are switched off and Jobs is placed out of the public’s watchful eye? The answer is Steve Jobs; a portrait of a fearless leader who, despite having been wounded emotionally, was able to recover from various financially punishing defeats, and was eventually spurred on to lovingly create a lavish piece of technology which expanded the way in which we perceive various elements within our world, and of course the way that information is consumed.

The highlight of Steve Jobs is of course the phenomenal, attention-seizing performance from Fassbender, who expertly exerts rawness of emotion in the most tense and in-depth of scenes, calmly delivering threats of anger in hushed tones, as if he was attempting to suppress an ungodly rage within him. His portrayal is both towering, menacing, and in many instances, one which expertly displays the qualities of a vicious and calculating leader, reminiscent of his critically lauded portrayal of Macbeth. But Fassbender allows Jobs’ humanity to remain, as the scenes shared between Jobs and his daughter Lisa (at various ages) are often touching, but overtake the narrative in a third act which seems desperately rushed and unfinished, almost derailing the film’s emotional payoff. However, the film only scratches the surface of Jobs’ character, intent on introducing various other characters before Jobs himself is given the material he deserves, in a story with far more engaging material to mine for.


The film itself is an obvious award’s contender, ticking all of the correct boxes (biopic of a legendary innovator, challenging lead role for an up-and-coming actor, dynamite screenwriting etc), particularly in regards to the supporting cast. The popular comedic actor and satirist Seth Rogen is also provided with some fine material here, much like his This Is the End co-star Jonah Hill, in Sorkin’s Moneyball, as he orchestrates a nuanced performance in a way audiences have not witnessed since 2011’s 50/50. Both films play upon Rogen’s instinctual vulnerability, which is put to effective use in Steve Jobs, as Rogen’s character Steve Wozniak deals with the harsh attitudes of a career within an unforgiving industry. Winslet is perhaps the weaker link within an otherwise outstanding ensemble, as she attempts to portray a Polish character (Joanna Hoffman) whose absence of a convincing accent is unnoticeable within the first act, yet gradually improves towards the film’s denouement, causing a sense of confusion, despite the undeniable improvement of her overall performance within the third act.  Meanwhile, Jeff Daniels, Sarah Snook and Katherine Waterston are criminally underused in generally undemanding roles, yet their elevation of the material is commendable.

Verdict

Steve Jobs, as a character, is akin to Apple’s revolutionary and advanced products; almost impenetrable. Yet, virtuoso performances, acerbic, witty and perspicacious dialogue, govern a film which despite skimming the surface of a technological pioneer, provides delightful visual flourishes, and an outstanding score from Daniel Pemberton (The Man from U.N.C.L.E.), whilst those who are not well-versed in Apple’s tumultuous affair with a troubled genius, are rewarded with a wealth of intriguing exposition. Unconventional and featuring a phenomenal attention-seizing performance from Fassbender, Steve Jobs is a vibrant revitalisation of a sub-genre shrouded in fatigue.


8 Stars out of 10
Written by Scott Gentry.


Film/TV Rating Key
1-2 stars out of ten = Awful.
3-4 stars out of ten = Average.
5-6 stars out of ten = Good.
7-8 stars out of ten = Excellent.
9-10 stars out of ten = Amazing.

Trailer




Clip